Prediction of Joelle Steur [537th] vs Amina Salibayeva [] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W L W W L
Form
L W L W L L L L L LH2H: Steur 1 - 0 Salibayeva
They have played 2 sets in total, with Steur winning 2 and Salibayeva winning 0. The last match between Steur and Salibayeva was at the W35 Antalya, 23-02-2025, Q1 round, Clay with Joelle Steur getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Joelle Steur | 1 |
| Amina Salibayeva | 0 |
| Steur | Stats | Salibayeva |
|---|---|---|
| 79% (23-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 537 | Ranking | N/A |
| 500 | Highest Rank | |
| 21 | Age | 18 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 59% (107-75) | Career Total W/L | 27% (8-22) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Steur VS Salibayeva H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-0 | |||||
Steur VS Salibayeva H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 0 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Joelle Steur vs Amina Salibayeva Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Steur 1 - 0 Salibayeva
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Steur has won 31.78% of points on their second serve, while Salibayeva has won 42.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Steur, in recent form, has won 51.58% of their opponent's second serve points, while Salibayeva has won 64.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.46% and 32.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Steur has saved 41.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Salibayeva has saved 21.43% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Steur has won 69.23% of matches played (W/L 36/ 16), with Salibayeva winning 31.25% (W/L 5/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Steur has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 97/ 63), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Salibayeva has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Steur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.33% of matches (W/L 22/ 8), where as Salibayeva has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 5/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Steur winning 1 times and Salibayeva being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Steur winning 2 and Salibayeva winning 0. The last match between Steur and Salibayeva was at the W35 Antalya, 23-02-2025, Q1 round, Clay with Joelle Steur getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Steur and Salibayeva have played a deciding set 0 times, with Steur winning 0 times and Salibayeva 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Steur winning 0, and Salibayeva 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Steur has played against opponents with an average rank of 438.31 while Salibayeva has played against players with an average rank of 242.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Steur has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Salibayeva has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Steur has converted 43.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Salibayeva has converted 31.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Joelle Steur vs Amina Salibayeva Best Odds For The Match
Joelle Steur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Mayar Sherif
Player
Joelle Steur
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
71%
(
17 of
24)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joelle Steur
Player
Nina Vargova
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
47%
(
20 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
48
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joelle Steur
Player
Qianhui Tang
80%
(
68 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
59 of
84)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
51%
(
43 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yelyzaveta Kotliar
Player
Joelle Steur
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve %
81%
(
22 of
27)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
16%
(
4 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
37
Total Points Won
15
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joelle Steur
Player
Nellie Taraba Wallberg
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Joelle Steur
Player
Jessica Bertoldo
88%
(
52 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joelle Steur
Player
Alice Rame
81%
(
88 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
53%
(
47 of
88)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
47%
(
51 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
103)
107
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joelle Steur
Player
Anja Stankovic
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
5 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joelle Steur
Player
Doga Turkmen
90%
(
47 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joelle Steur
Player
Suana Tucakovic
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Amina Salibayeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ganz
Player
Amina Salibayeva
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
88%
(
30 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Anastasia Safta
Player
Amina Salibayeva
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Steur vs Salibayeva?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Steur Vs Salibayeva is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (107/75) | Win/Loss | 27% (8/22) |
| 57% (237/178) | Sets Win/Loss | 25% (15/46) |
| 53% (1959/1728) | Games Win/Loss | 38% (202/331) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 62 | Aces Total | 2 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 303 | Total Double Faults | 46 |
| 1:28:12 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 435.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 224.77 |
| 73% (7038/9617) | 1st Serve % | 58% (401/694) |
| 56% (3945/7038) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (188/401) |
| 44% (1139/2579) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (98/293) |
| 51% (668/1312) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (36/76) |
| 48% (4763/9836) | Return Points Win % | 43% (302/695) |
| 59% (105/178) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 24% (7/29) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (19/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 55% (30/55) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 85% (109/93) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (7/7) |
| 15% (109/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (7/0) |
| 19% (73/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (23/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
